The Dark Magic of Structured Finance
Alex Tabarrok of Marginal Revolution provides the most clear explanation I have seen of how financial markets tried and failed to manage risk.
Alex Tabarrok of Marginal Revolution provides the most clear explanation I have seen of how financial markets tried and failed to manage risk.
Last week, Seth Masket posted about the disincentives toward winning majority power that some political actors might face. I thought it was a cute argument, but mostly bunk. However, some figures from Vanity Fair make me reconsider (via Political Wire). In the past year, liberal magazines are doing poorly but sales and subscriptions to conservative magazines are up – even in the down economy.
If (relative) political extremists are willing to purchase media as a way to compensate for their favored party’s minority status, doesn’t that potentially speak to the Tea Party movement? In this light, the Tea Party movement is just a group of vendors selling t-shirts and conventions, profiting off of angst like the magazine publishers. Maybe they’re just monetizing the hate. Real parties need elites, maybe the Tea Partiers are just angry consumers with political roots who need more than magazines.
Alex Tabarrok of Marginal Revolution on the non-linearities induced by imbalanced sex ratios in the marriage market.
As The Munger would say, don’t forget that most important economic decision variable which is price. The tickets are relatively inexpensive and beer and hot dogs are relatively inexpensive as well. Sure the quality of the product on the field matters and probably the impression of the quality (a lagged measure winning and excitement) probably matters more, but price matters too.
We’ve been to games twice this year. Tickets close to the field probably cost 1/4 what they would have cost at Fenway Park.